Showing posts with label wireless. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wireless. Show all posts

Comcast Sets Xfinity Mobile Wireless Launch; Salesforce celebrates capping of tallest building west of Chicago



 Subscribe in a reader
Subscribe to Philadelphia Tech News by Email




Comcast Sets Xfinity Mobile Wireless Launch With Verizon, Promising Big Savings (Variety)

Comcast: How Will ‘Xfinity Mobile’ Define Success? Asks BTIG (Barron's Tech Trader Daily)

Comcast Enters Wireless Business With $45-a-Month Service (Bloomberg)

Xfinity Mobile Isn't a WiFi Phone Service (Mari Silbey / Light Reading)



Salesforce is celebrating the capping of the tallest building west of Chicago, and the views are astounding (CNBC)




Comcast's new tower: 1,121 ft

Salesforce's new tower: 1,070 ft



Reports: Lyft hails another $500 million
(Axios)

Philadelphia’s Chamber Of Commerce Sues To Halt City Pay Equity Law (CBS Local)


Office Practicum moves into Fort Washington Office Park
(Ambler Gazette)







Comcast Earnings beat expectations: Expanding X1, looking to wireless launch

Tom Paine



 Subscribe in a reader






On a morning where the big question was the extent to which Verizon and Charter might be engaged in M&A talks, Comcast released its earnings for Q4 2016 and the full year.


Revenue grew 9.2% and adjusted EPS grew 9.9% for the quarter, beating expectations. Continuing the reversal of a long-term trend, video customer net additions were 80,000 for the quarter, and for 2017 Comcast had its best video customer results in 10 Years, with 161,000 net additions.

Programming expense rose just a tick over 10% in 2016, but Comcast expects it to rise 13% in 2017 due to the latest round of rights agreements before moderating the following year.

NBCU revenue grew 13.0% in the quarter, as Theme Parks continued gushing growth and profits.

Business Services, which grew by 16.1% for the year, is now at a $5.5 billion annual run rate.

Comcast is increasing its dividend by 15% per share, splitting its stock two-for-one, and expects to repurchase $5 billion of stock this year.

Comcast said penetration of its X1 interface is expected to increase from 48% at year-end to the low 60s over the next year.


Comcast indicated a mid-year launch for its wireless offering (likely in just a few areas to begin with). Chairman & CEO Brian Roberts said he expects "most popular mobile devices" to be available for the service. Roberts also said that after reaching limited scale, Comcast expected each incremental customer to be NPV (Net Present Value) profitable. CFO Mike Cavanagh said to expect a $200 to $300 million drag on operating cash flow from wireless until Comcast starts breaking it out separately. Beyond that, the company was rather tight-lipped about wireless.

There seems to be a developing consensus that wireless and cable assets, in some combination, are the best way to provide 5G LTE. Cable's backhaul capacity, and its indoors networking capabilities ( where cellular is weak on its own) are valuable assets to the wireless industry.


Round Numbers


Charter: Marketcap - $90bn LTD - $35bn

Comcast: Marketcap - $181bn LTD - $49bn

Verizon: Marketcap - $200bn LTD - $104bn

AT&T: Marketcap -$260bn LTD -$113bn


Source: Yahoo Finance as of close 1/26/2017. AT&T as of 1/27 morning.

Comcast beats on earnings and revenue
(CNBC)

Comcast Backs Bet on X1
Plans to expand X1 penetration beyond 60% in 2017, seek more licensing opportunities
(Multichannel News)

Comcast Chief Pressed on Wireless Rollout Plan, Regulatory Environment Under Trump (Variety)

Cox thanks white-label X1 for best video performance since 2008 (FierceCable)

Verizon, Charter Talks Heating Up? Malone Vision Key (IBD)


Verizon Exploring Potential Charter Merger (Report) (Variety)

Verizon CEO Said to Approach Maffei About Possible Charter Deal (Bloomberg)

Verizon: Reasons Charter Speculation Makes No Sense, Per Wells (Barron's Tech Trader Daily0





Links 5/23: Hulu's value; Universal Display would benefit from OLED in iPhones



 Subscribe in a reader
Subscribe to Philadelphia Tech News by Email




Hulu Now Worth $25 Billion, up From $15 Billion, Analyst Says (Hollywood Reporter)

NBC Sports jumps into the livestream game just in time for the Olympics (Mashable)

NBC Sports enters video streaming business with Playmaker(Sports Business Daily)



Comcast CEO: We're keeping options open to compete in wireless (CNBC)


Universal Display Surges 8%: Apple iPhone To Boost Earnings Next Year, Says Goldman (Barron's Tech Trader Daily)

Apple’s Suppliers Gear Up to Bring New Screens to 2017 iPhone (Bloomberg)

The Oracle-Google Case Will Decide the Future of Software (Wired)


Host Analytics – on the growth train (Diginomica)
Partners with Qlik.

Veeva launches product-specific cloud-based data management system (OutSourcing Pharma)

NetSuite and the Year of the Vertical Cloud ( Vinnie Mirchandani/ Enterprise Irregulars)

Can the Billy Penn model for local news work beyond Philadelphia? We’re about to find out. (Poynter)






Don't expect to see a Comcast wireless offering soon

Tom Paine



 Subscribe in a reader
Subscribe to Philadelphia Tech News by Email







Don't expect to see a Comcast-branded wireless offering in your local Comcast store anytime soon, some analysts say.


"In our view, this was a formality, not an indication that the fifth wheel is being aligned. We believe Comcast was merely preserving its right to offer service through the agreement, and see no imminent move by Comcast," Jefferies analyst Mike McCormack said in a note to clients, as quoted by website FierceCable.

Comcast's interests in forming what could be a fifth major cell network (in much of the country) are not clear, and it remains to be seen how far it would go down that path by itself.

Comcast's main goal is probably to support mobile distribution of video content to its customers, although I think the understanding of what that need is has broadened to become more all-encompassing over time. But Comcast does have a potential cost advantage in its millions of WiFi hotspots, which could be combined with the Verizon LTE access it has a right to resell to create a full-fledged network. But the cost advantages would have to be overwlelming for Comcast to consider that route. Indeed, the idea of investing billions to be a reseller of another's spectrum in combinstion with using hotspots (that are in customer's homes in a majority of instances and possibly open to legal challenges down the road), seems risky.

But spectrum is spectrum and is intrinsically valuable. And Comcast is going to need a mobile strategy, if only to support the out-of-home streaming habits of its customers.

And a deal with Sprint, possibly a complete acquisition, has to be an option to be considered as well. But an expensive one.

The MVNO (mobile virtual network operator) arrangement between Comcast and other cable operators (who will mostly end up as part of the proposed Charter/TWC marriage) and Verizon dates back to a controversial 2012 spectrum sale by the cable group to Verizon that included other provisions. The agreement, some including myself argued, was intended to effectively end cable/Verizon competition in both mobile communications and high speed landline communications.

Another consideration is that terms of the MVNO itself may have to be renegotiated, perhaps to Verizon's advantage.

Comcast also needs to consider its growing business services requirements.







On TruePosition


About three weeks ago I commented on a reported siginificant decline in results at TruePosition, the Berwyn wireless location-based services vendor which is 89% owned by John Malone's Liberty Media(and attributed to its Liberty Capital Group tracking stock). BTW, at the time I referred to its technology as "GPS based" but it really is not. Rather, it finds locations by calculating the distances between different cell towers.
So I looked into it and this is what I found in Liberty's 10-Q filing:

REVENUE. Our consolidated revenue increased $168 million or 8.3% and $390 million or 9.9% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, as compared to the corresponding prior year period. The three month increase is due primarily to a $63 million or 3.9% increase for QVC, $66 million generated by Starz Media, which we acquired in August 2006 and $50 million generated by the Atlanta Braves, which we acquired in May 2007. The six month increase is due to a $192 million or 6.0% increase for QVC, $127 million generated by Starz Media and $50 million generated by the Atlanta Braves. In addition, we recognized a full six months of revenue for Provide and FUN in 2007. These increases were partially offset by $27 million and $51 million decreases for TruePosition for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. In November 2006, TruePosition signed an amendment to its existing services contract with Cingular Wireless that requires TruePosition to develop and deliver additional software features. Because vendor specific objective evidence related to the value of these additional features does not exist, TruePosition is required to defer revenue recognition until all of the features have been delivered. TruePosition estimates that these features will be delivered in the first quarter of 2008. Accordingly, absent any further contractual changes, TruePosition will not recognize any revenue under this contract until 2008. TruePosition's services contract with its other major customer, T-Mobile, Inc., has a similar provision which prevents TruePosition from recognizing revenue. It should be noted, however, that both Cingular Wireless and T-Mobile are paying currently for services they receive and that the aforementioned deferrals have normal gross profit margins included. See Operating Results by Business below for a more complete discussion of QVC's and Starz Entertainment's results of operations.

I'm not sure what this means. Is this simply a short-term blip caused by specific requirements for deliverables that is (virtually) guaranteed to be made up in 2008, or does this reflect some degree of client dissatisfaction with the performance of the product that could materially effect the long-term financial prospects of the business? I don't know. There may not be a big problem here, and I know there are legal limitations on what you can say and can't say, but if I was an investor in the company I would want a clearer explanation than that.

TruePosition's core application right now is to provide systems that enable wireless carriers meet FCC standards for E-911 coverage. This past week, The FCC considerably toughened those standards in ways that could help TruePosition. Accuracy requirements must be meet at local service area levels rather than on statewide average levels. The implications of this are obvious in a state such as Pennsylvania, with the large concentration of population in a few areas and the rest of the state being mostly rural. Benchmarks have been established toward ensuring full compliance by September 11, 2011. Many in the industry are very critical of the standards and timelines, believing that new technologies are being tested and developed that could provide better performance in the future. But if wireless carriers are forced to ramp up quickly, using existing technologies, TruePosition should be in a position to benefit, both in terms of business from their existing US customers(AT&T and T-Mobile), and also in the potential to pick up business from other carriers who might at the very least need TruePosition in order to achieve some kind of "hybrid" solution.

Lastly, on Friday TruePostion won a patent-infringement case against Andrew Corp in the amount of $45.3 million, after a two week trial in Delaware. The amount of the award could be potentially tripled, though in any case such as this at the Federal District Court level, it will probably be a long time before they see any money out of it.